MAL won by 6 wickets

88/4

87/6

NEP won by 6 runs

289/7

248/8

May 1, 2026 12:30 pm

United States of America Women

62/4

GER won by 162 runs

308/1

146/10

JER won by 6 wickets

92/10

93/4

Day 1 - Surrey elected to bowl

Surrey

Sussex

342/9

Fixtures > Table >

Day 1 - Hampshire elected to bowl

Hampshire

Glamorgan

274/1

Fixtures > Table >

Day 1 - Somerset elected to bowl

Somerset

Yorkshire

140/5

Fixtures > Table >

Day 1 - Leicestershire elected to bowl

Leicestershire

Nottinghamshire

195/1

Fixtures > Table >

Day 1 - Derbyshire elected to bowl

Kent

239/5

Derbyshire

Fixtures > Table >

Day 1 - Worcestershire elected to bat

Northamptonshire

Worcestershire

180/8

Fixtures > Table >

Day 1 - Middlesex elected to bat

Middlesex

136/2

Durham

Fixtures > Table >

NEP-W won by 8 wickets

36/6

40/2

Match completed

166/6

163/7

Islamabad United need 113 runs in 55 remaining balls

Islamabad United

74/4

Hyderabad Kingsmen

186/5

Fixtures > Table >

Delhi Capitals need 116 runs in 10.3 remaining overs

225/6

110/1

May 2, 2026 7:30 am

May 2, 2026 10:00 am

May 2, 2026 1:00 pm

May 2, 2026 1:30 pm

All

Pakistan Lodge Complaint Over Controversial DRS Review in Bangladesh ODI Decider

by Shekhar March 16, 2026

307

Add as a preferred source on Google

[ Poll: Qydr18Z8 ]

Pakistan complained to match referee Neeyamur Rashid after a controversial DRS call in the last over of the third ODI against Bangladesh. The problem was that umpire Kumar Dharmasena allowed Bangladesh to review the second-last ball, even though it seemed to go against the usual rules.

"The Pakistan team management believe Bangladesh took the review after a replay of the delivery flashed up on the big screen, and as a result came up (to the referee) after the game and informed (him) about their observation," a source confirmed to Cricbuzz.

"Pakistan felt Bangladesh were allowed to review outside the maximum 15 seconds (window) within which such a decision must be made," he said.

Pakistan raise DRS timing concern after late review call in third ODI

Cricbuzz understands that Pakistan head coach Mike Hesson met Rashid after the match to officially make the complaint. While it isn't clear what outcome PCB are seeking from the complaint, insiders suggest the match referee met with Hesson and tried to explain the situation in detail, suggesting the hosts did not take any undue advantage.

The moment happened when Pakistan were chasing 291 and were nine wickets down, needing 12 runs from the last two balls. Rishad Hossain bowled down the leg side to Shaheen Afridi, and umpire Kumar Dharmasena called it a wide. Bangladesh could not review the wide call directly, but they appealed for LBW, which sent the decision to the third umpire.

Jay Shah Breaks Silence on T20 World Cup, Says No Team Is Bigger Than ICC Jay Shah spoke for the first time about the recently finished T20 World Cup, which faced some uncertainty before it began last month.

by Shekhar March 15, 2026

LastModified Date: 2026-03-16 20:28:35

FAQs

Q. Why did Pakistan complain after the third ODI against Bangladesh?

Pakistan complained over a controversial DRS review decision in the final over, claiming Bangladesh were allowed to review outside the 15-second limit.

Shekhar

I am a passionate content writer who enjoys creating clear, engaging, and informative content. I focus on writing articles, blogs, and web content that are easy for readers to understand. My goal is to turn ideas into meaningful words that connect with people and provide value.